A Simple Key For תגיש לי Unveiled

Please recall to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which center on the nominator is not going to impact the results of the nomination. Thanks!

הבחורה פשוט לא הרפתה ועגבה על סער בכל הזדמנות היה פשוט לא נעים סער נכנע לה ואכל את עצמו אח"כ .בצדק הבחורה חולה. והכי הכי-כמה מים בזבזו שניהם במקלחת

עולים על הכביש

When you have not designed the media oneself then It's also wise to specify where you located it, i.e., generally website link to the website where you obtained it, as well as the phrases of use for information from that site. If the content is a derivative of the copyrighted get the job done, you'll want to offer the names and also a licence of the original authors also.

יש לו משום מה השפעה,והוא מושך בחוטים לטובת עצמו.תורף כלפים,מלכלך,מסכסך... עם הבאה של איש שוכר שלום וצדק.

File:EAC_IMG_6549.JPG has long been detailed at Commons:Deletion requests so which the Local community can talk about irrespective of whether it should be kept or not. We'd appreciate it if you could possibly visit voice your opinion concerning this at its entry.

Remember to keep in mind to reply to and – if correct – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which center on the nominator will never have an effect on the result of the nomination. Thanks!

אני משתדל ככל יכלתי להוקיר ולהצדיק אמון זה, ומקווה להמשיך לתרום לויקיפדיה העברית, וגם לויקיפדיות אחרות, ככל שאוכל.

For those who have not made the media on your own then It's also wise to specify where you found it, i.e., usually backlink to the web site in which you obtained it, as well as conditions of use for content from that web page. In the event the articles can be a by-product of a copyrighted function, you have to provide the names plus a licence of the initial authors at the same time.

כעת, בעת שאת עורכת, תגלי שבחלקו התחתון של חלון העריכה שלך, בין הצלמית "תצוגה מקדימה" והצלמית "הצגת שינויים", נוספה צלמית חדשה המכונה "בדיקה".

Thanks for uploading Impression:KD_1946.JPG. I notice the graphic web site at the moment isn't going to specify who produced the material, And so the copyright status is unclear. In case you have not established this media yourself then you must argue that Now we have the proper to make use of the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging down below).

For those who designed this file, please Observe that The truth that it's been proposed for deletion will not essentially imply that we don't worth your variety contribution. It merely implies that just one human being believes that there's some precise difficulty with it, such as a copyright difficulty.

When you designed this file, make sure you Be aware that the fact that it's been proposed for deletion isn't going to always imply that we website don't worth your type contribution. It merely implies that a single individual believes that there's some certain issue with it, such as a copyright issue.

Impression deletion warning Graphic:PP105.jpg has long been mentioned at Commons:Deletion requests so which the Group can talk about no matter if it should be retained or not. We'd enjoy it if you could potentially go to voice your feeling concerning this at its entry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *